His schizophrenia is available for all interested parties to see. It is almost certain that the cognitive dissonence in him has reached the utmost levels of despair. You see, i am so beneath him he couldn't find the time to reply. I merely asked him a few simple honest questions. I sent him an email a while back and he didn't respond to it. Was he God incarnate and the savior of millions within whom he placed an astral doppleganger of himself? Probably not.ĭavid Lane is a hypocrite. Charan, in his informal moments, was a nice gentleman with a good sense of humor. One thing I can say from personal experience. In fact, who really was Charan, Sawan, Jaimal, Saligram, Seth Shiv Dayal or any of these characters? Which do you believe? Where is all this coming from? They enjoy his relaxed and more laid back style.īut spin is spin. They like the new spin and the more casual, less dogmatic approach of Gurinder. The reaction from these folks is favorable. I have heard from the several satsangis that I am still in contact with that Gurinder is indeed saying things in his talks of the SantMat 3.0 nature and is not going along with all of the Sant Mat 1.0 dogma. It was the same old, same old, but Gurinder was not there. I have not attended any satsangs since the early 90's except for one in Sedona a couple of years ago which I attended with some devotee friends. Say the same thing to vast multitudes at Beas.Īs I stated above, I have not been associated with Sant Mat or any other spiritual group for many years.
And, agressively attacks us as people withīut, it depends on his audience. He is indeed saying to smaller live sessionsīut, he seems to only say them to Westernĭavid Lane or Mike Williams.
He wanted to change the dogma, but was stuck It became obvious he was about to take a different path right from the start.īut, his live satsangs rang the same old dogma. The local satsang leader saying, "Gurinder When Gurinder first came online, I remember The "new" appears to be a deep and fundamental change.įor you satsangis, which is the real deal? How do you explain Gurinder's dismissal of his guru's teachings?īeas is now in this same catch 22 situationīut, Gurinder is reversing long established The "new" is not just minor adjustments in terminology and approach to suit the changing mores of culture, audience and the times. I have long since quit my association with this quasi religio-cult, but I stuck with it for 20-25 years. What do you satsangis have to say about this? If I were a devotee of this "path" I would be very disturbed by this turn of events. Who is the real master? Charan? Gurinder? Neither? If indeed the teachings of his predecessor, and the predessors before him are "hogwash", then who is he? By what authority or evidence does Gurinder make his claims? Now Gurinder comes along and says a lot of the Sant Mat dogma is hogwash, to condense his heretical views into one convenient slang term.
Rssb satsang in vancouver free#
Charan Singh is Gurinder Singh's predecessor by whose authority Gurinder is now in power.Ĭharan Singh wrote Sant Mat books which contain teachings that Gurinder, by accounts I have heard, discounts in his talks.Īccording to Sant Mat and Gurinder's master and predecesor, Charan Singh, all perfect masters have the same path to teach of the need for a perfect master who has reached the highest region of Sat lok and whose method is Surat Shabd Yoga, the highest of all spiritual paths and the only true path to God and to our true eternal home of ecstatic bliss free from the sufferings of karma and the illusions of Maya.
0 kommentar(er)
